TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT – termination at initiative of employer – ss.394, 400, 604 Fair Work Act 2009 – permission to appeal – Full Bench – at first instance the Commission found the appellant had resigned voluntarily from her employment with the respondent and dismissed her application – appellant’s representative submitted the decision manifested an injustice and the legal principles applied by the Commission were disharmonious when compared with other recent decisions of the Commission dealing with similar matters – asserted errors of jurisdiction, errors of law and significant errors of fact – submitted that the overwhelming weight of evidence supported a finding that the appellant’s resignation was forced upon her – Full Bench held the submissions from the appellant’s representative regarding the jurisdiction of the Commission were misconceived – a number of issues are dealt with by the Commission prior to a merits arbitration hearing – Full Bench unable to identify any error of the kind outlined in House v King – can identify no significant or other error of fact in the decision at first instance – appellant unhappy with the outcome of her application – satisfied the conclusions in relation to the alleged constructive dismissal of the appellant were available to the Commission on the evidence – not satisfied there is any public interest in granting permission to appeal – permission to appeal refused. Appeal by Reynolds against decision and order of Roberts C of 13 April 2016 [[2016] FWC 1187] and [PR577340] Re: Highfields Preparatory and Kindergarten School Ltd t/a Highfields
…
