TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT – performance – s.394 Fair Work Act 2009 – application fro relief from unfair dismissal – applicant employed as Environmental Officer – dismissed for unsatisfactory work performance – failure to follow water quality monitoring and reporting procedures – request fro suppression order refused [Justin Corfield] – Commission found respondent had valid reason to terminate applicant’s employment – found dismissal unfair – respondent’s acceptance of her performance over a significant period of time means it was unfair to terminate her employment without having provided her with clear notice that her performance was such that her employment was at risk – her supervisor was not unaware of the procedures he needed to follow, he simply dis not follow them – not satisfied reinstatement appropriate – compensation of $13,884.62, less tax according to law, and $1,319.04 superannuation ordered. Wallis v Savannah Nickel Mines P/L t/a Panoramic Resources
…
