TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT – misconduct – ss.394, 400, 604 Fair Work Act 2009 – permission to appeal – Full Bench – at first instance Commission held that the appellant had been unfairly dismissed – found valid reason for the appellant’s termination but considered the dismissal was harsh, unjust or unreasonable due to a procedurally flawed and unfair termination process – held applicant 75% responsible for his termination and awarded reduced compensation based on this finding – appellant expressed general dissatisfaction with the Commission’s decision and sought permission to appeal – submitted he worked for the company honestly, he had been treated badly and did not engage in the conduct found to have occurred – Coal & Allied considered – held appellant’s appeal was a statement of dissatisfaction with the Commission’s conclusions and he had failed to demonstrate any error on the part of the Commission – appeal not in the public interest – permission to appeal refused. Appeal by Weldemichael against decision of Roberts C of 10 March 2016 [[2016] FWC 164] Re: Carbridge P/L t/a Easycart Australia
…
