CASE PROCEDURES – stay order – s.604 Fair Work Act 2009 – appeal – application for stay order – Commission issued decision and order that appellant pay part of respondents legal costs in unfair dismissal application – before stay order is granted Commission required to be satisfied that arguable case exists with some reasonable prospects of success in respect of both question of leave to appeal and substantive merits of appeal and that balance of convenience favours granting of stay – Edghill considered – appellant submitted that Commission denied procedural fairness as schedule of costs relied upon in making decision as to quantum of cost was not provided – appellant could not make submissions as to appropriateness – appeal not lodged within 21 days of decision – satisfied arguable case existed with some reasonable prospect of success – found appellant would not suffer financial hardship if required to comply with order – found respondent would repay monies paid if order was varied or set aside – balance of convenience does not favour granting of stay – application for stay order dismissed. Appeal by Just Relations – Consultants against decision and order of Bissett C of 25 November 2016 [[2016] FWC 8491] and 27 January 2017 [PR589765] Re: Ecolab P/L
…
