TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT – termination at initiative of employer – ss.394, 400, 604 Fair Work Act 2009 – permission to appeal – Full Bench – appeal against decision which found that applicant had resigned from employment and dismissed unfair dismissal application – applicant’s grounds of appeal lengthy and confusing – Full Bench found many of the arguments raised were an attempt to reargue the case and seek a different outcome – not open to appeal bench to substitute its view of the matters for determination at first instance in the absence of an appealable error in the decision at first instance – Full Bench could not identify any arguable appealable error – not able to identify any matter in appeal that might have enlivened the public interest – not persuaded appeal raised any issues of importance or general application, nor that it identified any relevant diversity of decisions at first instance – not arguable that decision at first instance manifested an injustice or that the result was counterintuitive – legal principles applied not disharmonious when compared with other recent decisions dealing with similar matters – permission to appeal refused – appeal dismissed. Appeal by Blythe against decision of Sams DP of 15 September 2016 [[2016] FWC 6160] Re: David Hartree Design Associates P/L t/a Hartree and Associates Architects
…
