TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT – extension of time – ss.394, 400, 604 Fair Work Act 2009 – permission to appeal – Full Bench – application for unfair dismissal remedy lodged 22 days late – appeal against decision dismissing application for extension of time – at first instance appellant submitted delay due to lack of clarity of when employment was terminated – test under s.400 characterised as ‘a stringent one’ [Coal & Allied Mining Services] – rarely appropriate to grant permission to appeal unless arguable case of appealable error demonstrated – Full Bench of the view application an attempt to reargue case and seek alternative outcome – held no arguable case of appealable error identified [House v The King] – not satisfied circumstances enliven public interest [GlaxoSmithKline] – permission to appeal refused. Appeal by Reynolds against order of Drake SDP of 4 March 2016 [PR577725] Re: SDA Schools (North NSW) Ltd
…
